http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2458106
i dunno. ninja basically worked, but ninja 2 took a hard left onto taking itself too seriously street. cutting everything having to do with the dead wife other than the death scene would have gone a long way towards fixing that issue. the pregnancy thing was completely unnecessary. as if the protagonist's personality was nuanced enough to need that extra motivation for revenge.
fight scenes: we got thems. they were plentiful and adequately impressive. i could have done with fewer stutters in the action, though. grimacing and posing do not get the job done. try punching or kicking or something like that. i also could have done with less focus on the stupid barbed wire strangling weapon thing. it was not even that good of a weapon. here is a tip. you want to knock somebody off, just shove them down the stairs or in front of a car. way easier, and it looks accidental. not when you do it to an entire encampment of armed guards, though. there is that.
also, who sends thugs bearing knives with the school logo on them after a guy you are certain will be able to beat the crap out of them? maybe the same guy who TAKES DRUG DELIVERIES IN THE DOJO OFFICE DURING BROAD DAYLIGHT WHILE THE PROTAGONIST WATCHES. i just, what.
ninja 2 gets two symbols for happiness.
2014-01-04
2014-01-03
13 assassins
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1436045
13 assassins is essentially a remake of seven samurai with six extra samurai. i do not mean that in a bad way. it is a fine film. also nice, it is an hour shorter than seven samurai. however, the six extra samurai are clearly too much; you cannot keep them all straight, and the introductions take forever. other than the noise about who the bad guy is, this is just an updated version of the kurosawa classic.
13 assassins gets three assassins. for a total of 16. see what i did there? math.
13 assassins is essentially a remake of seven samurai with six extra samurai. i do not mean that in a bad way. it is a fine film. also nice, it is an hour shorter than seven samurai. however, the six extra samurai are clearly too much; you cannot keep them all straight, and the introductions take forever. other than the noise about who the bad guy is, this is just an updated version of the kurosawa classic.
13 assassins gets three assassins. for a total of 16. see what i did there? math.
lovelace
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1426329
lovelace comes off almost as a documentary, but because it obviously was not a documentary, i had a hard time getting into it.
sigh. and before i go any further, let me just add that this review does not contain any double-entendres.
where was i. oh yeah. i was also confused at first because every time i hear "lovelace", i think of *ada* lovelace, not linda. it just goes to show what happens when parents do not bring their children up right. this movie, of course, showed what happens when parents *do* bring their children up right--they go into the porn industry and marry into abusive and exploitative relationships.
lovelace gets two starring roles in a feature film.
lovelace comes off almost as a documentary, but because it obviously was not a documentary, i had a hard time getting into it.
sigh. and before i go any further, let me just add that this review does not contain any double-entendres.
where was i. oh yeah. i was also confused at first because every time i hear "lovelace", i think of *ada* lovelace, not linda. it just goes to show what happens when parents do not bring their children up right. this movie, of course, showed what happens when parents *do* bring their children up right--they go into the porn industry and marry into abusive and exploitative relationships.
lovelace gets two starring roles in a feature film.
serpico
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070666
serpico was not bad, but i had a hard time relating to it. i am slowly coming to believe that the main thing al pacino does is this kind of bug-eyed hangdog wtf expression. now that i have seen it, i cannot unsee it, and it is ruining pretty much every al pacino movie for me. it is like the time i read an article that said THE ROCK only has two modes, nice-guy mode and super-serious-ass-kicker mode. so now, though i still love THE ROCK with every fiber of my being, i cannot watch him in something without categorizing his performance into one of those two buckets. and sometimes into both buckets. have you seen his walking tall remake? god i love THE ROCK. i can even stomach johnny knoxfield a little bit now.
anyway, THE ROCK was not in this movie. serpico gets TWO ROCKS.
serpico was not bad, but i had a hard time relating to it. i am slowly coming to believe that the main thing al pacino does is this kind of bug-eyed hangdog wtf expression. now that i have seen it, i cannot unsee it, and it is ruining pretty much every al pacino movie for me. it is like the time i read an article that said THE ROCK only has two modes, nice-guy mode and super-serious-ass-kicker mode. so now, though i still love THE ROCK with every fiber of my being, i cannot watch him in something without categorizing his performance into one of those two buckets. and sometimes into both buckets. have you seen his walking tall remake? god i love THE ROCK. i can even stomach johnny knoxfield a little bit now.
anyway, THE ROCK was not in this movie. serpico gets TWO ROCKS.
2013-12-24
the babysitters
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0796302
the babysitters is one of those movies where i am not sure i should admit to seeing it. in this case, it is because the plot involves a bunch of minors prostituting themselves out with married men. the rationale for them doing so was basically just to make money, which seemed a little weak. or maybe the protagonist (aka the pimpstress) was motivated by a feeling of betrayal? it was not clearly communicated. anyway, this fell short of being soft core by a clear margin, but there was still enough skin to engender a kind of guilty titillation.
the babysitters has no surprises aside of the sheer number of "what?" moments. kudos for having the pimpstress solve her own problems instead of calling in one of the male characters to beat someone up, though. i give it two troubled dollars.
the babysitters is one of those movies where i am not sure i should admit to seeing it. in this case, it is because the plot involves a bunch of minors prostituting themselves out with married men. the rationale for them doing so was basically just to make money, which seemed a little weak. or maybe the protagonist (aka the pimpstress) was motivated by a feeling of betrayal? it was not clearly communicated. anyway, this fell short of being soft core by a clear margin, but there was still enough skin to engender a kind of guilty titillation.
the babysitters has no surprises aside of the sheer number of "what?" moments. kudos for having the pimpstress solve her own problems instead of calling in one of the male characters to beat someone up, though. i give it two troubled dollars.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)